Monday, January 30, 2012

Week Two the difference in parts of the cities and critiques


If you close your eyes, and think of an urban area, what comes to mind?  Is it a skyline that blocks out the sun, is it the sound of farm equipment working in the not to distant pasture.  What ever your idea of an urban area is it will always be slightly different from one person to the next.  All urban areas no matter how they are thought of are designed and planned out using key locations such as nodes and paths.  Each and every area has a node that has been planned out and most likely is lead there by a path.  These areas can be as purposely built as examples of Europe with town squares such as the St. Mark Square in Venice Italy.  Then it can run to a more up and coming area of a new city such as the area around of Cowboys Stadium in Dallas Texas, where people are building around it to make it even more of a node.   The way that these form or sometimes deliberate and sometimes it is just a surprise that they form and then are just thrown into an area which then tries to accommodate it as best it can.  When this happens it leads to an up building trying to maintain and further the node until it is central to the idea of the area.

Some pictures for examples:

-This one of the Cowboys Stadium and how as soon as it was built became a node and many other companies and groups wanted to build around it turning it into a true node.  A up start not truly designed one but still a good node.


            -The squire of Brussels Belgium and how it was made into the focal point and node of the area to hold all type of events gatherings and anything conceivable by people. 


We then continue to paths and edges going right along with the critique of a city.  Paths and edges are used to not only open a city up but also keep parts of the city away from others.  This can probably be seen best in areas such as New York City and Los Angles.  In these two particular areas, paths lead from one area to the next but will not go through some of them to help try and avoid certain undesirable areas.  This is because the cities wish to exclude parts such as dumps or the run down living areas.  This is for the simple fact that they are not up to standard or attractive to the urban areas over all goals.  These areas get second hand treatment and through such a edge or barrier is created to prevent them from being truly part of the city.  This has been done over time as subtle as in LA where it is a drainage area separating to different sections of a city or to the far extreme in history such as the Berlin Wall.  The idea is to separate the worse section of the city from that of the more prosperous and node region.  Leading into the critique of a city that it favors some over others and does not fully support its entirety.  When this happens it becomes clear that the city does not care about a certain area and has given up letting it go into ruin.  This can be best seen today of a city slowly killing of sections of itself, in the example of Detroit Michigan. 


Some more pictures as examples:

            -The picture of a former opera house in Detroit and how the city has let it fall apart for it is no longer in a key location and so they have taking the path away from it and just let it fall into the worst part of the city.

            - A drainage ditch in New Orleans used to separate one side from the other and by dueling such putting a physical edge between each other so that they will not be together and that there is someway to force the node to one side of the other to which the path will go as well.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Week One the change in identity of an urban area


The change of the urban society, is different, and is never consistent to one area or type of change.  There are many reasons for the change in the structure and purpose of an urban center.  In the beginning, the primary reason for a city to pick its location, either had to do with protection or key location in control of an area or trade.  Those are the original reasons to why cities picked their places and developed with that in mind.  Take cities like Baghdad (Iraq) and Cape Town (South Africa), both cities grew up based on trade and due to one reason or another are no longer as important in trading as they once were.  For Baghdad, the transition from moving items across land to moving them across the oceans.  Which, then is why Cape Town became so important, as I key stop along the ocean trade rout around Africa.  This was until the Suez Cannel was built, and Cape Town became less of an important location in the trade industry.  The same concept happened in Europe, with castles being built for protection but then being abandoned later.  This was due to cannons being brought to Europe and able to destroy a wall from far away.  All these changes have one thing in common they are the adverse reaction to an advancement in science.  With advances in Science urban areas are forced to change and adapt, but due to the long process of change, most times people move to a more modern or currently important urban area instead of waiting for theirs to evolve.   Thus bringing around the migrant work force that is, common today around the world.  This is because people travel to were opportunity is, and will always continue to do so.  With this moving of people and ideas that force urban areas to change they turn away from their roots and shift into something that is not their original purpose causing some transitional problems and truly forming different and new cities all to their own. 
            Other factors can push for change in urban areas, which the last great time this was seen was after world war one, and in the great depression in the United States of America.  During this time frame agriculture forced the moving of millions.  With the collapse of the finical sector, people turned to farming.  However when a drought hit that just devastated the crops people in the hundreds of millions abandoned any sense of home and traveled around the country looking for work.   With people having no home and just moving as migrant workers cities changed and even grew out of nowhere such as tent cities.  The forcing of people to adapt to a different living status forced the urban life to go through radical changes so not only will science force changes but also agriculture and financial reasons will force changes as well.  Probably the most modern case in the United States of America would be Silicon Valley in California, as soon as tech became important and a very large financial sector millions moved there and the surrounding area to be apart of it and to alter the previous urban ideology of the area.  


Below is a link to the library of congress and an article to further explain the movement of people and what it does to an urban ideal.


http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/afctshtml/tsme.html

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Test

First post up.